The humour (which seems to be one of its selling points) didn’t really appeal to me - at times I felt like I was watching an episode of ‘It Ain’t Half Hot Mom’ with my parents - they are laughing, I know it’s funny, but I can’t quite bring myself to laugh.
Mostly the humour revolves around- hierarchy, procedure, religion and sex and toilets.Ineffectual men and dominant women (The First Lady was my favourite character!).Petty inner rivalries.At times I am reminded of Catch 22.I wonder what we are meant to gain from reading this book - is satire meant to carry a serious message or just to entertain?
A lot of the book revolves around knocking people down to size - important people make to look stupid and vice versa.
I liked the sections told from the perspective of Shigri more than those of Zia.Perhaps because he is the downtrodden one, and we gain more personal access to his feelings.I also likes the way the dual narratives steadily came together to a conclusive meeting point.
Hanif has a good eye to detail, which makes for some decent pieces of prose, I’d like to see what he does with a more straight novel, as this didn’t really appeal to me.
‘The scribbling on the walls is in three language and the writers have used a variety of materials. I can read two of the languages, the third I have to guess.I can make out the etchings done with nails.The dried rust is probably blood, and I don’t wan to think what else they might have used.’
Your new approach to Booker-analysis is so refreshing - i wish all reviews could be this honest and bold... As a side note and without meaning to sound shallow (and I haven't read it) I feel that the cover is the best thing about this book. Bring on the crows!!
1 comment:
Your new approach to Booker-analysis is so refreshing - i wish all reviews could be this honest and bold... As a side note and without meaning to sound shallow (and I haven't read it) I feel that the cover is the best thing about this book. Bring on the crows!!
Post a Comment